From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taurone v. Presidential Life Ins. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 21, 2003
301 A.D.2d 587 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-04150

Argued December 16, 2002.

January 21, 2003.

In an action, inter alia, to recover money due as the beneficiary of an annuity contract, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (DiBlasi, J.), entered March 20, 2002, which granted the defendants' respective motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Lauterbach Garfinkel, LLP, Yonkers, N.Y. (Leon A. Lauterbach and Howard Garfinkel of counsel), for appellant.

Israelson Gold, Plainview, N.Y. (Jeffrey B. Gold of counsel), for respondent Presidential Life Insurance Company.

Babchik Young, LLP, White Plains, N.Y. (Norman R. Ferren of counsel), for respondent Joseph Soricelli.

Before: ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P., CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, THOMAS A. ADAMS, STEPHEN G. CRANE, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

The plaintiff, the cousin of the decedent William Birney, commenced this action, inter alia, to recover moneys she claims are owed to her as the beneficiary of an annuity contract issued to Birney by the defendant Presidential Life Insurance Company (hereinafter Presidential). The defendant Joseph Soricelli was the insurance broker who submitted the application to Presidential on behalf of Birney.

Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, the Supreme Court properly determined, as a matter of law, that neither she nor Birney's estate was entitled to receive payments under the annuity or repayment of the balance of the premium. The annuity contract, as amended by Birney upon its delivery to him, clearly and unambiguously specified that its benefits were limited to lifetime $1,000 monthly payments to the decedent and that no death benefits were payable (see Fisher v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 120 Misc.2d 635). Accordingly, summary judgment was properly granted to the defendants (see Alvarez v. Prospect Hosp., 68 N.Y.2d 320, 324; Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557).

The plaintiff's remaining contentions are without merit.

FLORIO, J.P., O'BRIEN, ADAMS and CRANE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Taurone v. Presidential Life Ins. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 21, 2003
301 A.D.2d 587 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Taurone v. Presidential Life Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:THERESA WALSH TAURONE, ETC., appellant, v. PRESIDENTIAL LIFE INSURANCE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 21, 2003

Citations

301 A.D.2d 587 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
753 N.Y.S.2d 847

Citing Cases

Norma Reynolds Realty, Inc. v. Edelman

The Supreme Court properly rejected the plaintiff's contention that it was entitled to a commission, as it is…

Ivaldi v. Metlife Invs. Ins. Co.

The annuity contract clearly and unambiguously specified that benefits there under were payable to the…