From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taterka v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 10, 1983
450 N.E.2d 247 (N.Y. 1983)

Opinion

Decided May 10, 1983

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, EDWARD H. LEHNER, J.

Harold I. Meyerson for appellant.

Robin Mary Heaney for respondent.


On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 91 A.D.2d 568).

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, MEYER and SIMONS. Taking no part: Judge FUCHSBERG.


Summaries of

Taterka v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 10, 1983
450 N.E.2d 247 (N.Y. 1983)
Case details for

Taterka v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company

Case Details

Full title:HARVEY B. TATERKA, Appellant, v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY et…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 10, 1983

Citations

450 N.E.2d 247 (N.Y. 1983)
450 N.E.2d 247
463 N.Y.S.2d 441

Citing Cases

Acquista v. New York Life Insurance Company

It is irrelevant whether plaintiff is still able to perform other types of tasks. To prevail on their motion,…

Acquista v. New York Life Insurance Company

It is irrelevant whether plaintiff is still able to perform other types of tasks. To prevail on their motion,…