From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tate v. Chapman

United States District Court, S.D. Illinois
Sep 8, 2006
Case No. 04-385-MJR (S.D. Ill. Sep. 8, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 04-385-MJR.

September 8, 2006


ORDER


Before the Court is plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery and Request for Admissions. (Doc. 47).

Defendants have served their initial disclosures, which are attached to the motion. Plaintiff asks the Court to overrule objections to his discovery requests, but there are no requests or objections attached, and the Court is therefore unable to rule on same. Likewise, there are no requests for admissions on file.

Upon consideration and for good cause shown, plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery and Request for Admissions (Doc. 47) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Tate v. Chapman

United States District Court, S.D. Illinois
Sep 8, 2006
Case No. 04-385-MJR (S.D. Ill. Sep. 8, 2006)
Case details for

Tate v. Chapman

Case Details

Full title:CARL TATE, Plaintiff, v. DR. CHAPMAN, PAM GRUBMAN, and DR. NEWBOLD…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Illinois

Date published: Sep 8, 2006

Citations

Case No. 04-385-MJR (S.D. Ill. Sep. 8, 2006)