From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tasso v. Aetna Insurance Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 2, 1998
247 A.D.2d 376 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

February 2, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Beisner, J.).


Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly declared that the defendant Atlantic Mutual Insurance Company had no duty to defend or indemnify the plaintiff in Doe v. Neilson, pending in the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, under Index No. 4416/94. The injuries alleged in Doe v. Neilson grow out of an alleged rape of Doe. Since the policy under which the plaintiff seeks to recover provides coverage for accidentally-caused injuries but clearly excludes coverage for injuries caused by an intentional act such as rape, there was no basis under which the, carrier might be compelled to indemnify or defend the plaintiff ( see, Mount Vernon Fire Ins. Co., v. Creative Hous., 88 N.Y.2d 347; U.S. Underwriters Ins. Co. v. Val-Blue Corp. 85 N.Y.2d 821; Pistolesi v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 223 A.D.2d 94; Ward v. Security Mut. Ins. Co., 192 A.D.2d 1000).

The plaintiff's remaining contentions are without merit.

Joy, J. P., Krausman, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Tasso v. Aetna Insurance Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 2, 1998
247 A.D.2d 376 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Tasso v. Aetna Insurance Company

Case Details

Full title:JOHN TASSO, Appellant, v. AETNA INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 2, 1998

Citations

247 A.D.2d 376 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
668 N.Y.S.2d 644

Citing Cases

Watkins Glen Central Sch. v. National Union

ose in the legal and medical fields (see, Carey v. Employers Mut. Cas. Co., 189 F.3d 414; Arthur J. Gallagher…

Physicians' Reciprocal Insurers v. Loeb

In opposition to PRI's prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, the defendants…