From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tarlow v. Archbell

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 27, 1946
70 N.E.2d 556 (N.Y. 1946)

Opinion

Argued October 15, 1946

Decided November 27, 1946

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, EDER, J.

Harold F. McGuire for appellants.

Morris Gottlieb, Mortimer Hays and Paul Bauman for respondents.


Order affirmed, with costs. First and fourth questions certified, answered in the negative. Second and third questions certified, answered in the affirmative. No opinion.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, THACHER, DYE and FULD, JJ.


Summaries of

Tarlow v. Archbell

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 27, 1946
70 N.E.2d 556 (N.Y. 1946)
Case details for

Tarlow v. Archbell

Case Details

Full title:KATE TARLOW et al., Respondents, v. J.E. ARCHBELL et al., Defendants; O.H…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 27, 1946

Citations

70 N.E.2d 556 (N.Y. 1946)
70 N.E.2d 556

Citing Cases

Samuelson v. Starr

" ( Levy v. Pacific Eastern Corp., 153 Misc. 488, 489-490.) Jurisdiction has, however, been retained in suits…

Merrick v. New York Subways Adv. Co.

use of action ( Wolf v. Domestic Broadtail Producers, 235 App. Div. 51; Indelli v. Lesster, 130 App. Div.…