From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Target v. Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd. (In re Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) Antitrust Litig.)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Mar 14, 2013
No. 11-cv-5514 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 14, 2013)

Opinion

No. 11-cv-5514 Case No. C-07-5944 SC MDL No. 1917

03-14-2013

In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION This Document Relates To: Target et. al. v. Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd. et al.

Jason C. Murray (CA Bar No. 169806) CROWELL & MORING LLP Counsel for Plaintiffs Old Comp Inc., Good Guys, Inc. Richard Snyder (admitted pro hac vice ) Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLP Attorney for Defendant Bejing Matsushita Color CRT Co. Ltd.


Jason C. Murray (CA Bar No. 169806)
CROWELL & MORING LLP
515 South Flower St., 40th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone: 213-622-4750
Facsimile: 213-622-2690
Email: jmurray@crowell.com
Counsel for Plaintiffs

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Old Comp Inc. and Good Guys, Inc. (collectively "Plaintiffs") initially filed a Complaint against Defendant Beijing Matsushita Color CRT Co., Ltd. ("BMCC") in November 2011 and subsequently filed an amended Complaint in January 2012;

WHEREAS, BMCC filed an Answer to Plaintiffs' Complaint on September 14, 2012;

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs opted out of the Indirect Purchaser Plaintiff Settlement Class regarding settlement with Defendant Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd. in January 2012 (the "Settlement");

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS WHEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the undersigned counsel, on behalf of their respective clients, as follows:

1. Plaintiffs shall dismiss all of their claims against BMCC, without prejudice, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

2. BMCC acknowledges that this dismissal shall not affect, nor will BMCC rely upon this dismissal to seek to prevent, Plaintiffs' inclusion in any future litigation or settlement classes in the above-captioned litigation, and this dismissal does not affect, nor will BMCC rely upon this dismissal to seek to prevent, Plaintiffs' right to seek inclusion in the Settlement.

3. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees.

4. This stipulation does not affect the rights or claims of any other plaintiff against any other defendant or alleged co-conspirator in the above-captioned litigation.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

______________________

Jason C. Murray (CA Bar No. 169806)

CROWELL & MORING LLP

Counsel for Plaintiffs Old Comp Inc., Good

Guys, Inc.

______________________

Richard Snyder (admitted pro hac vice)

Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLP

Attorney for Defendant Bejing Matsushita

Color CRT Co. Ltd.

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Samuel Conti


Summaries of

Target v. Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd. (In re Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) Antitrust Litig.)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Mar 14, 2013
No. 11-cv-5514 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 14, 2013)
Case details for

Target v. Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd. (In re Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) Antitrust Litig.)

Case Details

Full title:In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION This Document Relates…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Mar 14, 2013

Citations

No. 11-cv-5514 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 14, 2013)