From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tannenbaum v. Wehrle

Municipal Court of New York, Borough of Manhattan, First District
Feb 2, 1929
133 Misc. 577 (N.Y. Mun. Ct. 1929)

Opinion

February 2, 1929.

Leo Gellens, for the plaintiff.

Ireland, Caverly Hendrickson, for the defendants.


This motion is made to vacate and set aside the service of the summonses made on the defendants, non-residents of the State of New York, pursuant to the provisions of section 285-a High. of the Highway Law (as added by Laws of 1928, chap. 465). The plaintiff began this action by the service of the summonses on the Secretary of State of New York and on the defendants, by mail, and by filing the summonses with the clerk of this court. The Municipal Court of the city of New York is without power to direct the service of a summons outside of the city of New York. ( Henning v. Camacho, 181 A.D. 856, 859; Mun. Ct. Code, § 14.) Service having been so made the motion must be granted.

Ordered accordingly.


Summaries of

Tannenbaum v. Wehrle

Municipal Court of New York, Borough of Manhattan, First District
Feb 2, 1929
133 Misc. 577 (N.Y. Mun. Ct. 1929)
Case details for

Tannenbaum v. Wehrle

Case Details

Full title:IRVING TANNENBAUM, Plaintiff, v. ANNA WEHRLE and Another, Defendants

Court:Municipal Court of New York, Borough of Manhattan, First District

Date published: Feb 2, 1929

Citations

133 Misc. 577 (N.Y. Mun. Ct. 1929)
232 N.Y.S. 659

Citing Cases

McCulloch v. American Carrier Corp.

The Municipal Court did not obtain jurisdiction of a non-resident by service on the Secretary of State,…

Berkowitz v. Dunphy

Heihs v. Reinberg is, therefore, not controlling here, because the facts are different. In the case of…