From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tankersley v. Fisher

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Sep 22, 2008
Case No. 3:08cv382/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. Sep. 22, 2008)

Opinion

Case No. 3:08cv382/MCR/EMT.

September 22, 2008


ORDER


This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated September 11, 2008 (Doc. 5). Petitioner has been furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered the report and recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus under § 2241 (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to afford Petitioner an opportunity to exhaust his administrative remedies in accordance with BOP procedures.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Tankersley v. Fisher

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Sep 22, 2008
Case No. 3:08cv382/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. Sep. 22, 2008)
Case details for

Tankersley v. Fisher

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM H. TANKERSLEY, Petitioner, v. SCOTT P. FISHER, WARDEN, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division

Date published: Sep 22, 2008

Citations

Case No. 3:08cv382/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. Sep. 22, 2008)

Citing Cases

Rojas v. Marianna

First, “there are grounds for doubt that a futility exception is available on a § 2241 petition in this…

Perez v. Warden

First, “there are grounds for doubt that a futility exception is available on a § 2241 petition in this…