holding that party could not unilaterally change terms of contract without giving user proper notice of proposed changes
Summary of this case from Good v. Uber Techs.No. 07–719.
2008-03-3
TALK AMERICA, INCORPORATED, petitioner, v. Joe DOUGLAS.
Case below, 495 F.3d 1062.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
holding that party could not unilaterally change terms of contract without giving user proper notice of proposed changes
Summary of this case from Good v. Uber Techs.Full title:TALK AMERICA, INCORPORATED, petitioner, v. Joe DOUGLAS.
Court:Supreme Court of the United States
Date published: Mar 3, 2008
A similar provision was held to be unenforceable. See, e.g., Douglas v. United States Dist. Court for the…
Kortum-Managhan v. Herbergers NBGLKeesun, 249 Mont. at 337, 816 P.2d at 421 (internal citations omitted). Similarly, in Douglas v. U.S. Dist.…