From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Talia v. Merry

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Cumberland
Nov 12, 1931
156 A. 892 (Me. 1931)

Opinion

Opinion November 12, 1931.

ALIENATION OF AFFECTIONS. VERDICTS. R. S., CHAP. 74, SEC. 7.

A verdict should not be directed for a defendant if, upon any reasonable view of the testimony, under the law, the plaintiff can recover.

In the case at bar, giving the most favorable view to the evidence introduced by the plaintiff, a prima facie case under the provisions of R. S., Chap. 74, Sec. 7, of alienation of the affections of the plaintiff's husband, could be found.

On exception by plaintiff. An action for alienating the affections of the plaintiff's husband. Trial was had at the April Term, 1931, of the Superior Court for the County of Cumberland. After the evidence had been presented, on motion of the defendant, the presiding Justice ordered a directed verdict for the defendant. Plaintiff seasonably excepted.

Exception sustained.

The case sufficiently appears in the opinion.

Samuel L. Bates, John H. Devine, for plaintiff.

Hinckley, Hinckley and Shesong, for defendant.

SITTING: PATTANGALL, C. J., DUNN, STURGIS, BARNES, FARRINGTON, THAXTER, JJ.


This is a suit against the defendant for alienating the affections of the plaintiff's husband. At the close of the evidence, upon motion, the presiding Justice directed a verdict for the defendant. An exception was allowed.

By R. S., Chap. 74, Sec. 7, a married woman may recover damages in an action on the case for the alienation of the affections of her husband or the loss of his aid, comfort and society by any arts, enticements and inducements of another woman more than eighteen years of age.

Alienation of affections only is alleged. A detailed statement of the testimony is unnecessary. Giving the most favorable view to the evidence introduced by the plaintiff, a prima facie case of alienation of the affections of the plaintiff's husband may be found. It is settled law that a verdict should not be directed for a defendant if, upon any reasonable view of the testimony, under the law, the plaintiff can recover. Tomlinson v. Clement Bros., 130 Me. 189.

Exception sustained.


Summaries of

Talia v. Merry

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Cumberland
Nov 12, 1931
156 A. 892 (Me. 1931)
Case details for

Talia v. Merry

Case Details

Full title:MARY TALIA vs. IDA MERRY

Court:Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Cumberland

Date published: Nov 12, 1931

Citations

156 A. 892 (Me. 1931)
156 A. 892

Citing Cases

Kimball v. Cummings

" See also Talia v. Merry, 130 Me. 414; 157 A. 236, which was an alienation case wherein a verdict was…

Jaeger v. Cutting

Verdict should not be directed for defendant if any reasonable view of the evidence would allow a recovery by…