From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Talcott v. Central Bank and Trust Co.

Supreme Court of Florida
May 3, 1972
262 So. 2d 658 (Fla. 1972)

Opinion

No. 41223.

May 3, 1972.

Writ of Certiorari to the District Court of Appeal, Third District.

Charles F. Mills of Quarles Mills, South Miami, for petitioners.

Pallot, Poppell, Goodman Shapo, Robert Orseck of Podhurst, Orseck Parks, Miami, for respondents.


The District Court of Appeal, Third District, has certified that its decision in this cause is one passing upon a question of great public interest. Article V, Section 4(2), Florida Constitution, F.S.A.

The factual circumstances, background, and questions involved are set forth in the decision of the District Court reported at 247 So.2d 727 (Fla.App.3rd, 1971).

We have reviewed the decision below, the record in the cause, the briefs of counsel for both sides, and have heard oral argument. It is our judgment that the decision of the District Court appropriately disposes of the issues presented. Accordingly, the opinion certified is approved as the response of this Court.

The writ of certiorari is therefore discharged.

ROBERTS, C.J., and ERVIN, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Talcott v. Central Bank and Trust Co.

Supreme Court of Florida
May 3, 1972
262 So. 2d 658 (Fla. 1972)
Case details for

Talcott v. Central Bank and Trust Co.

Case Details

Full title:LEROY E. TALCOTT, JR., ET AL., PETITIONERS, v. CENTRAL BANK AND TRUST CO.…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: May 3, 1972

Citations

262 So. 2d 658 (Fla. 1972)

Citing Cases

Walker v. U-Haul Company, Inc.

Appellant contends, alternatively, that his satisfying the judgment obtained against Humphrey and U-Haul…

Volkswagen of America v. Emerson

That satisfaction extinguished the liability of Bankers and Shippers Insurance Company and we therefore…