From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tafari v. Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 21, 2007
45 A.D.3d 1139 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 502211.

November 21, 2007.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain disciplinary rules.

Injah Tafari, Romulus, petitioner prose.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Patrick Barnett-Mulligan of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Spain, Carpinello, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ.


During a search of petitioner's cell, a number of items were recovered, including a torn state-issued sheet. When petitioner was returned to his cell following the search, he threatened a correction officer with physical violence. As a result, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with possessing excess property, possessing property in an unauthorized area, damaging state property and making threats. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, he was found guilty of the latter two charges and the determination was affirmed on administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. The misbehavior report, together with the testimony at the hearing, provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt ( see Matter of Fontaine v Superintendent of Southport Correctional Facility, 35 AD3d 1113, 1114, appeal dismissed 8 NY3d 943; Matter of Johnson v Goord, 28 AD3d 882, 882). Petitioner's contrary testimony presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve ( see Matter of Accardi v Goord, 34 AD3d 945, 946). Additionally, we find no error in the Hearing Officer's failure to make further inquiry regarding petitioner's mental capacity inasmuch as it was not placed in issue pursuant to the governing regulations ( see 7 NYCRR 254.6 [b] [1]) and petitioner did not exhibit any signs of mental impairment at the disciplinary hearing. Petitioner's remaining contentions have been examined and are without merit. We, therefore, decline to disturb the determination of guilt.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Tafari v. Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 21, 2007
45 A.D.3d 1139 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

Tafari v. Selsky

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of INJAH TAFARI, Petitioner, v. DONALD SELSKY, as Director…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 21, 2007

Citations

45 A.D.3d 1139 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 9160
844 N.Y.S.2d 913

Citing Cases

Zaire v. Artus

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a tier II disciplinary determination finding…

William v. Donald

We confirm. Initially, although the hearing transcript contains some inaudible portions, they are not so…