From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taccino v. Homeq Ser

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 26, 2010
399 F. App'x 799 (4th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 10-1260.

Submitted: September 16, 2010.

Decided: October 26, 2010.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey, Chief District Judge. (3:08-cv-00185-JPB).

William A. Taccino, Marlene M. Taccino, Appellants Pro Se. Wendy Anne Owens, Law Office of Wendy A. Owens, PC, Savannah, Georgia; Marshall Howard Ross, Wharton, Aldhizer Weaver, PLC, Harrisonburg, Virginia; Jason Patrick Foster, Steptoe Johnson, LLP, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


William A. Taccino and Marlene M. Taccino appeal the district court's order granting summary judgment to Defendants in this civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Taccino v. Homeq Serv., No. 3:08-cv-00185-JPB (N.D.W.Va. Feb. 18, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Taccino v. Homeq Ser

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 26, 2010
399 F. App'x 799 (4th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

Taccino v. Homeq Ser

Case Details

Full title:William A. TACCINO; Marlene M. Taccino, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. HOMEQ…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Oct 26, 2010

Citations

399 F. App'x 799 (4th Cir. 2010)

Citing Cases

Taccino v. Morrisey

Judge Bailey found that Plaintiff "pled no facts which would indicate that the defendants' foreclosure on the…