From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tabler v. Davis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION
Mar 20, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:20cv111 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 20, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:20cv111

03-20-2020

RICHARD TABLER v. LORIE DAVIS


MEMORANDUM OPINION REGARDING VENUE

Plaintiff Richard Tabler, an inmate confined at the Polunsky Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, proceeding with counsel, brings this lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Lorie Davis, the Director of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

The above-styled action was referred to the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge for consideration pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and the Local Rules for the Assignment of Duties to United States Magistrates.

Analysis

Plaintiff complains of the conditions of his confinement at the Polunsky Unit located in Livingston, Texas. Since filing his complaint, plaintiff has filed a motion to transfer venue (docket entry no. 3).

The Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. §1981, et seq., under which this case is brought, does not contain a specific venue provision. Accordingly, venue in civil rights cases is controlled by 28 U.S.C. § 1391. Jones v. Bailey, 58 F.R.D. 453 (N.D. Ga. 1972), aff'd per curium, 480 F.2d 805 (5th Cir. 1973).

When, as in this case, jurisdiction is not founded solely on diversity of citizenship, 28 U.S.C. § 1391 provides that venue is proper only in the judicial district where the defendants reside or in which the claim arose. The claims which form the basis of plaintiff's complaint occurred at the Polunsky Unit which is located in Polk County. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 124, Polk County is located in the Eastern District of Texas. As a result, venue is proper in the Eastern District of Texas.

While Polk County is in the Eastern District of Texas, it is in the Lufkin Division of such district, rather than the Beaumont Division. When a case is filed in the wrong district or division, the court "shall dismiss, or if it be in the interest of justice, transfer such case to any district or division in which it could have been brought." 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). See Kreimerman v. Casa Veerkamp, S.A. de C.V., 22 F.3d 634 (5th Cir. 1994) (remanding the case to the Houston Division of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, with instructions that the case be transferred to the McAllen Division of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas pursuant to Section 1406(a)).

For the reasons set forth above, it is

ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to transfer venue is GRANTED. Accordingly, this case should be transferred to the Lufkin Division of this court. A Transfer Order shall be entered in accordance with this Memorandum.

SIGNED this 20th day of March, 2020.

/s/_________

Zack Hawthorn

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Tabler v. Davis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION
Mar 20, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:20cv111 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 20, 2020)
Case details for

Tabler v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD TABLER v. LORIE DAVIS

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION

Date published: Mar 20, 2020

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:20cv111 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 20, 2020)

Citing Cases

Mitchell v. Perdido Trucking, LLC

Mitchell also asserts a claim under the Civil Rights Act (42 U.S.C. § 1981) and the Surface Transportation…

Mitchell v. Perdido Trucking, LLC

Mitchell also asserts a claim under the Civil Rights Act (42 U.S.C. § 1981) and the Surface Transportation…