From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

T. D. Turner Co. v. Dodson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Feb 6, 1912
121 P. 1087 (Okla. 1912)

Opinion

No. 1544

Opinion Filed February 6, 1912. Rehearing Denied April 2, 1912.

REVIEW. The syllabus is the same as in McCord-Collins Mercantile Company v. Mary A. Dodson, ante, 121 P. 1085.

(Syllabus by Ames, C.)

Error from Comanche County Court; James H. Wolverton, Judge.

Replevin by Mary A. Dodson against J. T. Windrow, a constable, for personalty taken by him under execution on a judgment in favor of T. D. Turner Co. against Frank Dodson, the husband of plaintiff. T. D. Turner Co. were substituted for Windrow as defendants below. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants bring error. Affirmed.

H. A. Smith, for plaintiffs in error.

Stubblefield Whalin, for defendant in error.


The questions involved in this case are identical with those involved in McCord-Collins Mercantile Company v. Mary A. Dodson, ante, 121 P. 1085, and on the authority of that case this should be affirmed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.


Summaries of

T. D. Turner Co. v. Dodson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Feb 6, 1912
121 P. 1087 (Okla. 1912)
Case details for

T. D. Turner Co. v. Dodson

Case Details

Full title:T. D. TURNER CO. v. DODSON

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Feb 6, 1912

Citations

121 P. 1087 (Okla. 1912)
121 P. 1087

Citing Cases

Jones v. Motors Acceptance Corp.

The execution by defendant of a forthcoming or redelivery bond in replevin or bail trover is an appearance in…