From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Szurnicki v. Janisch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 11, 1994
202 A.D.2d 1071 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

March 11, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, Oshrin, J.

Present — Green, J.P., Balio, Fallon, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We affirm for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court (Oshrin, J.). We add only that petitioners' argument concerning the failure of respondent Kings Park Board of Education to comply with its own policy regarding notice was not raised at Supreme Court and is, therefore, not addressed on this appeal (see, Collucci v. Collucci, 58 N.Y.2d 834, 836-837). We further conclude that this proceeding is not barred by laches (see, Schreier v Cummings, 250 App. Div. 808).


Summaries of

Szurnicki v. Janisch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 11, 1994
202 A.D.2d 1071 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Szurnicki v. Janisch

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY SZURNICKI et al., Appellants, v. CAROL JANISCH et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 11, 1994

Citations

202 A.D.2d 1071 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
612 N.Y.S.2d 983

Citing Cases

Nocro, Ltd. v. Russell

ted]; see, Gordon v Rush, 100 NY2d at 242) Further, there must be a finding that the apparent harm inflicted…