From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Symonette v. Deneen

United States District Court, Northern District of Florida
May 3, 2024
4:24v34-MW/MAF (N.D. Fla. May. 3, 2024)

Opinion

4:24v34-MW/MAF

05-03-2024

MAURICE SYMONETTE, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW DENEEN, Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Mark E. Walker Chief United States District Judge

This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. ECF No. 8. The Magistrate Judge recommends dismissal for a number of reasons, including failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and lack of federal jurisdiction. Although Plaintiff may be able to state a state-law tort claim, the absence of a federal claim precludes this Court from exercising supplementary jurisdiction over any remaining state-law claim. See Reddy v. Gilbert Med. Transcription Serv., Inc., 588 Fed.Appx. 902, 904 (11th Cir. 2014) (“Absent a viable federal claim, however, the district court should dismiss any state law claims.”).

Accordingly, upon consideration, no objections having been filed by the parties,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation, ECF No. 8, is accepted and adopted as this Court's opinion. Plaintiff's amended complaint is due to be dismissed without leave to amend as amended would be futile. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, “Plaintiff's amended complaint, ECF No. 6, is DISMISED without prejudice to file in state court for failure to state a claim and for lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction.” The Clerk shall close the file.

SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Symonette v. Deneen

United States District Court, Northern District of Florida
May 3, 2024
4:24v34-MW/MAF (N.D. Fla. May. 3, 2024)
Case details for

Symonette v. Deneen

Case Details

Full title:MAURICE SYMONETTE, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW DENEEN, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Florida

Date published: May 3, 2024

Citations

4:24v34-MW/MAF (N.D. Fla. May. 3, 2024)