affirming dismissal of a claim at the summary judgment stage where "[t]he accommodations the plaintiff asserts should have been provided were . . . never requested or even suggested by the plaintiff"
Summary of this case from Gil v. Vortex, LLCNo. 06-P-96.
June 6, 2007.
Decisions Pursuant to Rule 1:28.
Judgment affirmed.
affirming dismissal of a claim at the summary judgment stage where "[t]he accommodations the plaintiff asserts should have been provided were . . . never requested or even suggested by the plaintiff"
Summary of this case from Gil v. Vortex, LLCFull title:SYLVIA CULHANE others v. BAYSTATE MEDICAL CENTER, INC
Court:Appeals Court of Massachusetts
Date published: Jun 6, 2007
This is particularly true in the absence of a nexus between the protected activity and Semmami's termination…
Gil v. Vortex, LLCVortex does not dispute this assertion, but argues that Gil's discrimination claims must fail because he…