From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sykes v. City of Niagara Falls

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Dec 27, 2013
112 A.D.3d 1302 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-12-27

In the Matter of Jason SYKES, Marc Martinez, Todd Faddoul and Shawn Arndt, Petitioners–Respondents, v. CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS, Respondent–Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment (denominated decision and order) of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Ralph A. Boniello, III, J.), entered September 11, 2012 in a CPLR article 78 proceeding. The judgment granted the petition to compel respondent to permanently designate petitioners as police detectives. Craig H. Johnson, Corporation Counsel, Niagara Falls (Christopher M. Mazur of Counsel), for Respondent–Appellant. Magavern Magavern Grimm LLP, Niagara Falls (Sean J. MacKenzie of Counsel), for Petitioners–Respondents.


Appeal from a judgment (denominated decision and order) of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Ralph A. Boniello, III, J.), entered September 11, 2012 in a CPLR article 78 proceeding. The judgment granted the petition to compel respondent to permanently designate petitioners as police detectives.
Craig H. Johnson, Corporation Counsel, Niagara Falls (Christopher M. Mazur of Counsel), for Respondent–Appellant. Magavern Magavern Grimm LLP, Niagara Falls (Sean J. MacKenzie of Counsel), for Petitioners–Respondents.
MEMORANDUM:

Petitioners are members of the Niagara Falls Police Department (NFPD) Crime Scene Unit and commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking designation as police detectives pursuant to Civil Service Law § 58(4)(c)(ii). After a hearing, Supreme Court granted the petition, concluding that petitioners were temporarily assigned to the same duties as detectives in the NFPD and thus were entitled to such designation in accordance with the statute ( see id.). Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to petitioners, the prevailing parties, we conclude that the court's decision is supported by a fair interpretation of the evidence ( see generally Matter of Harnischfeger v. Moore, 79 A.D.3d 1706, 1707, 914 N.Y.S.2d 482, lv. dismissed16 N.Y.3d 848, 922 N.Y.S.2d 263, 947 N.E.2d 154; Matter of City of Syracuse Indus. Dev. Agency [Alterm, Inc.], 20 A.D.3d 168, 170, 796 N.Y.S.2d 503).

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. SMITH, J.P., CENTRA, FAHEY, CARNI, and WHALEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Sykes v. City of Niagara Falls

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Dec 27, 2013
112 A.D.3d 1302 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

Sykes v. City of Niagara Falls

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Jason SYKES, Marc Martinez, Todd Faddoul and Shawn Arndt…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 27, 2013

Citations

112 A.D.3d 1302 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
112 A.D.3d 1302
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 8684