From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Swicher v. Swisher

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Aug 17, 1984
454 So. 2d 83 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Opinion

No. AX-90.

August 17, 1984.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Duval County, Harold R. Clark, J.

Jerome M. Novey, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Nachman, Oberdorfer Barry, P.A., Jacksonville, for appellee.


David Michael Swisher, on this appeal from the final judgment of dissolution of marriage, contends that the trial court erred in finding that he had no special equity in the marital home and ordering that the proceeds from the sale of the home be divided equally with the appellee, his former wife. The undisputed evidence establishes that appellant paid the down payment on the marital home out of money he had inherited from his grandfather's estate. The appellee testified that her husband paid $40,000, while appellant contends he paid the full $55,000 down payment. Both contributed equally to the mortgage payments on the home after the purchase.

The trial court's failure to recognize the husband's special equity in the marital home under these circumstances is reversible error. Landay v. Landay, 429 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 1983). We reverse and remand for a determination of the amount of the down payment paid by appellant from the proceeds of his grandfather's estate and the entry of judgment awarding appellant a special equity in the marital home in accordance with the formula set forth in Landay v. Landay, supra.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

SHIVERS and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Swicher v. Swisher

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Aug 17, 1984
454 So. 2d 83 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)
Case details for

Swicher v. Swisher

Case Details

Full title:DAVID MICHAEL SWISHER, APPELLANT, v. GARETH M. SWISHER, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Aug 17, 1984

Citations

454 So. 2d 83 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Citing Cases

Bowlin v. Bowlin

The trial court's failure to recognize the wife's special equities under these circumstances is reversible…