From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Swenarton v. Hancock

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 1, 1881
84 N.Y. 653 (N.Y. 1881)

Opinion

Submitted February 8, 1881

Decided March 1, 1881

Man Parsons for appellant Swenarton.

Jeremiah S. Black Thomas W. Bartley for appellant Hutton.

William H. Taggard for respondent Locke.

Rufus L. Scott Edwin G. Davis for respondent Walsh.

James W. Field and Kissam Embury for respondents Thacher et al.

Amos G. Hull for respondents Allen et al.

Chilion B. Allen for other respondents.


DANFORTH, J., reads for affirmance.

All concur, except RAPALLO, J., absent.

Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

Swenarton v. Hancock

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 1, 1881
84 N.Y. 653 (N.Y. 1881)
Case details for

Swenarton v. Hancock

Case Details

Full title:JOHN SWENARTON et al., Appellants, v . MARY HANCOCK et al., Respondents

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 1, 1881

Citations

84 N.Y. 653 (N.Y. 1881)

Citing Cases

Matter of O'Brien

"It may be shown, for instance, that the amount it represents was not due to him who executed it; that it has…

In re Burris' Estate

It is true that a person has the right to change his mind with respect to the disposition of his property, by…