From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sweeney v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
May 7, 2014
138 So. 3d 1095 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

Summary

remanding for trial court to correct statute number on defendant's sentence

Summary of this case from Obas v. State

Opinion

No. 4D13–3427.

2014-05-7

Patrick SWEENEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Lisa Porter, Judge; L.T. Case No. 91–018941 CF10A. Patrick Sweeney, South Bay, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Don M. Rogers, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Lisa Porter, Judge; L.T. Case No. 91–018941 CF10A.
Patrick Sweeney, South Bay, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Don M. Rogers, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.

Appellant Patrick Sweeney appeals a trial court order denying his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), which did not correct an apparent scrivener's error. The record demonstrated a scrivener's error in the citation to section 775.0823, Florida Statutes (1991), in appellant's written sentence, when the correct statute was section 775.0825. The State's response filed in the trial court conceded that the court should correct the statute number on appellant's sentence. The trial court previously amended the judgment of conviction to reflect the correct statutory citation, but did not amend the sentence to correct the error.

Insofar as this is an instance of a scrivener's error in appellant's sentence, rather than a judicial determination or error, we affirm the trial court's order denying the motion to correct illegal sentence. See Betts v. State, 128 So.3d 158 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013). However, we also remand with directions that the error be corrected in appellant's sentence. Appellant's presence is not required for this correction. Williams v. State, 697 So.2d 584 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997).

Affirm; remand to correct scrivener's error in appellant's sentencing. TAYLOR, LEVINE and CONNER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Sweeney v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
May 7, 2014
138 So. 3d 1095 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

remanding for trial court to correct statute number on defendant's sentence

Summary of this case from Obas v. State
Case details for

Sweeney v. State

Case Details

Full title:Patrick SWEENEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Date published: May 7, 2014

Citations

138 So. 3d 1095 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

Citing Cases

Obas v. State

Accordingly, we affirm appellant's convictions and sentences but remand with instructions for the trial court…

Hunt v. State

Although we affirm the order denying appellant's motion, we remand with directions that the scrivener's…