From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sweat v. Cook

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nov 30, 2010
402 F. App'x 807 (4th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 10-6595.

Submitted: November 18, 2010.

Decided: November 30, 2010.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (9:09-cv-01255-HFF).

Reginald C. Sweat, Appellant Pro Se. James E. Parham, Jr., Irmo, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Reginald C. Sweat appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sweat v. Cook, No. 9:09-cv-01255-HFF, 2010 WL 1444190 (D.S.C. April 9, 2010). We deny Sweat's motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Sweat v. Cook

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nov 30, 2010
402 F. App'x 807 (4th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

Sweat v. Cook

Case Details

Full title:Reginald C. SWEAT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dorris COOK, Head Nurse…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Nov 30, 2010

Citations

402 F. App'x 807 (4th Cir. 2010)

Citing Cases

Ray v. S. Carolina Dep't of Corr.

The undersigned recognizes that “[i]n this Circuit, verified complaints by pro se litigants are to be…

Plumer v. Collier

, at *1 (D.S.C. Mar. 12, 2010), (citing Williams v. Griffin, 952 F.2d 820, 823 (4th Cir.1991)), adopted, 2010…