From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Swatzell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 16, 1997
691 So. 2d 594 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Opinion

Case No. 96-1854

Opinion filed April 16, 1997.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Monroe County, Richard J. Fowler, Judge.

LOWER TRIBUNAL NO. 95-715

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Howard K. Blumberg, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LEVY, GREEN, and SHEVIN, JJ.


CONFESSION OF ERROR


Michael Swatzell appeals his sentence asserting error in a special condition of probation imposed by the trial court. Based on the state's proper confession of error, we strike the following special condition of probation: that defendant have no contact with anyone under 18 years of age unless supervised by someone over the age of 25. This condition is impermissibly broad because the possibility of unintentional violation exists. See Rowles v. State, 682 So.2d 1184 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996); Oliver v. State, 672 So.2d 105 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Graham v. State, 658 So.2d 642 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). We, therefore, strike the condition and remand the case to the trial court to rephrase the condition in a manner that minimizes the potential for inadvertent violations.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Swatzell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 16, 1997
691 So. 2d 594 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)
Case details for

Swatzell v. State

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL SWATZELL, Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Apr 16, 1997

Citations

691 So. 2d 594 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Citing Cases

Matthews v. State

A number of courts, on direct appeal from an order of probation, have found similar conditions impermissibly…

Manon v. State

In support of his argument defendant cites several cases in which courts have reversed similar probationary…