From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Swartz v. Householder

SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
Sep 15, 2016
2016 Ohio 5817 (Ohio 2016)

Opinion

Nos. 2014–1208 2014–1209.

09-15-2016

SWARTZ, Appellee, v. HOUSEHOLDER et al., Appellants. Shannon et al., Appellees, v. Householder et al., Appellants.

Critchfield, Critchfield & Johnston, Ltd., Steven J. Shrock, Millersburg, and Clinton Bailey, Mount Vernon, for appellees. Burton Law, L.L.C., and Robert L. Guehl, Dayton, for appellants.


Critchfield, Critchfield & Johnston, Ltd., Steven J. Shrock, Millersburg, and Clinton Bailey, Mount Vernon, for appellees.

Burton Law, L.L.C., and Robert L. Guehl, Dayton, for appellants.

{¶ 1} The judgments of the court of appeals are reversed on the authority of Corban v. Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C., 149 Ohio St.3d 512, 2016-Ohio-5796, 76 N.E.3d 1089, and Walker v. Shondrick–Nau, 149 Ohio St.3d 282, 2016-Ohio-5793, 74 N.E.3d 427.

O'CONNOR, C.J., and O'DONNELL, LANZINGER, KENNEDY, and FRENCH, JJ., concur.

PFEIFER and O'NEILL, JJ., dissent.


Summaries of

Swartz v. Householder

SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
Sep 15, 2016
2016 Ohio 5817 (Ohio 2016)
Case details for

Swartz v. Householder

Case Details

Full title:SWARTZ, APPELLEE, v. HOUSEHOLDER ET AL., APPELLANTS. SHANNON ET AL.…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

Date published: Sep 15, 2016

Citations

2016 Ohio 5817 (Ohio 2016)
150 Ohio St. 3d 341
81 N.E.3d 1221

Citing Cases

West v. Bode

The argument in Swartz was that a DMA plaintiff should not be permitted to use the 20-year DMA period because…

Jefferis Real Estate Oil & Gas Holdings, LLC v. Schaffner Law Offices, L.P.A.

The Ohio Supreme Court reversed this court's holding in Swartz as to the 1989 Dormant Mineral Act. Swartz v.…