From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Swanson v. Danielson

United States District Court, District of Oregon
Jul 11, 2023
Civ. 6:23-cv-00754-MK (D. Or. Jul. 11, 2023)

Opinion

Civ. 6:23-cv-00754-MK

07-11-2023

MICHAEL SWANSON, Plaintiff, v. KEVIN DANIELSON, Defendant.


ORDER

Michael McShane, United States District Judge

Magistrate Judge Mustafa Kasubhai filed a Findings and Recommendation (#5), and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed.R.Civ.P. 72. Although Plaintiff did not file objections, the Court reviewed the legal principles de novo. United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1445 (9th Cir. 1998). The Court finds no error and conclude the report is correct. Magistrate Judge Kasubhai's Findings and Recommendation (#5) is adopted. The Complaint (#1) is DISMISSED. Plaintiff's state law tort claim is dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff is granted 30 days to file an amended complaint meeting the exceptions enumerated in 28 U.S.C. § 2679(b)(2).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Swanson v. Danielson

United States District Court, District of Oregon
Jul 11, 2023
Civ. 6:23-cv-00754-MK (D. Or. Jul. 11, 2023)
Case details for

Swanson v. Danielson

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL SWANSON, Plaintiff, v. KEVIN DANIELSON, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of Oregon

Date published: Jul 11, 2023

Citations

Civ. 6:23-cv-00754-MK (D. Or. Jul. 11, 2023)

Citing Cases

White v. Dietrich

Giblin v. Bloomfield, No. C19-5480 BHS-TLF, 2020 WL 4808654, at *2 (W.D. Wash. July 15, 2020), report and…