From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sutton v. Bradley

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 26, 2007
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:07-CV-1798 (M.D. Pa. Dec. 26, 2007)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:07-CV-1798.

December 26, 2007


ORDER


AND NOW, this 26th day of December, 2007, upon consideration of the report (Doc. 22) of the magistrate judge to which no objections were filed recommending that plaintiff's motion (Doc. 7), which seeks a preliminary injunction or temporary restraining order to improve of the conditions of plaintiff's confinement, be denied as moot because plaintiff is no longer incarcerated within this judicial district, and after an independent review of the record, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. The report and recommendation (Doc. 22) of the magistrate judge is ADOPTED.
2. Plaintiff's motion (Doc. 7) for a preliminary injunction or temporary restraining order is DENIED as moot. See Ibarra-Villalva v. USP-Allenwood, 213 F. App'x 132, 134 (3d Cir. 2007) (upholding denial of prisoner's challenge to conditions of confinement as moot because prisoner was transferred to another institution).
3. The above-captioned matter is REMANDED to the magistrate judge for further proceedings.


Summaries of

Sutton v. Bradley

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 26, 2007
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:07-CV-1798 (M.D. Pa. Dec. 26, 2007)
Case details for

Sutton v. Bradley

Case Details

Full title:EUGENE SUTTON, Plaintiff v. CAPTAIN E. BRADLEY, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Dec 26, 2007

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:07-CV-1798 (M.D. Pa. Dec. 26, 2007)

Citing Cases

Deen-Mitchell v. Lappin

hick recommends that the court deny the motion (Doc. 122) of pro se plaintiff Wallace Deen-Mitchell…

Deen-Mitchell v. Lappin

Plaintiff is no longer incarcerated at USP Lewisburg. Since filing this motion, Plaintiff has been…