From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Suttles v. Burbridge

Supreme Court of Florida, Division B
Feb 11, 1926
107 So. 646 (Fla. 1926)

Opinion

Decision Filed February 11, 1926.

A Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Duval County; George Couper Gibbs, Judge.

Haley Heintz and John W. Dodge, for Plaintiff in Error;

Axtell Rinehart, for Defendant in Error.


This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record upon writ of error taken under the statute to the order of the Circuit Court granting a new trial herein, and the briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said order. It is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said order be, and is hereby affirmed. The decision is controlled by Owens v. Wilson, 58 Fla. 335, 50 South. Rep. 674; Clary v. Isom, 55 Fla. 384, 45 South. Rep. 994; McLendon v. Lurton-Hardaker Co., 83 Fla. 263, 91 South. Rep. 113; Ruff v. Georgia, S. F. R. Co., 67 Fla. 224, 64 South. Rep. 782; Carney v. Stringfellow, 73 Fla. 700, 74 South. Rep. 866; Farrell v. Salary, 43 Fla. 124, 31 So. 283; Herrin v. Avon, 87 Fla. 385, 100 So. Rep. 174; Gulf Refining Co. v. Howard, 82 Fla. 27, 89 South. Rep. 349; Cheyney v. Roberts, 77 Fla. 324, 81 South. Rep. 475; Beverly v. Hardaway, 66 Fla. 177, 63 South. Rep. 702; and notby Bishop v. Taylor, 41 Fla. 77, 25 South. Rep. 287; Philadelphia Underwriters' Ins. Co., of North America v. Bigelow, 48 Fla. 105, 37 South. Rep. 210; Winn v. Coggins, 53 Fla. 327, 42 South. Rep. 897; Feinberg v. Stearns, 56 Fla. 279, 47 South. Rep. 797; Georgia Southern F. R. Co. v. Hamilton Lumber Co., 63 Fla. 150, 58 South. Rep. 838; Nathan v. Thomas, 63 Fla. 235, 58 South. Rep. 247; Cotton States Belting Supply Company v. Florida R. Co., 69 Fla. 52, 67 South. Rep. 568; Jackson Bros. Lumber Co. v. Yaeger McCaskill, 80 Fla. 611, 86 South. Rep. 500; and Philips v. Lowenstein, filed January 23, 1926.

Affirmed.

WHITFIELD, P. J., AND TERRELL AND BUFORD, J. J., concur.


Summaries of

Suttles v. Burbridge

Supreme Court of Florida, Division B
Feb 11, 1926
107 So. 646 (Fla. 1926)
Case details for

Suttles v. Burbridge

Case Details

Full title:NORMAN D. SUTTLES, Plaintiff in Error, v. PHOEBE N. BURBRIDGE, Defendant…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida, Division B

Date published: Feb 11, 1926

Citations

107 So. 646 (Fla. 1926)
107 So. 646

Citing Cases

Seaboard Air Line R. R. Co. v. Wester

See Sec. 2905, Revised General Statutes 1920; Winn v. Coggins, 42 So. 897, 53 Fla. 327, text 328; Phillips v.…

Scott v. Nat. City Bk. of Tampa

The rule is that the appellate court will not reverse an order granting a new trial unless it clearly appears…