From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sutherlin v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION
Mar 10, 2015
1:13-cv-01603-SEB-DKL (S.D. Ind. Mar. 10, 2015)

Summary

finding two state agency opinions determining that claimant did not meet any listing to "satisfy the requirement for expert medical opinion on the issue of medical equivalence"

Summary of this case from Neldon v. Berryhill

Opinion

1:13-cv-01603-SEB-DKL

03-10-2015

RANDAL W. SUTHERLIN, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The Magistrate Judge submitted her Report and Recommendation on Plaintiff's Complaint for Judicial Review. The parties were afforded due opportunity pursuant to statute and the rules of this Court to file objections; none were filed. The Court, having considered the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, hereby adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation.

03/10/2015

/s/_________

SARAH EVANS BARKER, JUDGE

United States District Court

Southern District of Indiana
Distribution: All ECF-registered counsel of record via email generated by the court's ECF system


Summaries of

Sutherlin v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION
Mar 10, 2015
1:13-cv-01603-SEB-DKL (S.D. Ind. Mar. 10, 2015)

finding two state agency opinions determining that claimant did not meet any listing to "satisfy the requirement for expert medical opinion on the issue of medical equivalence"

Summary of this case from Neldon v. Berryhill
Case details for

Sutherlin v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:RANDAL W. SUTHERLIN, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

Date published: Mar 10, 2015

Citations

1:13-cv-01603-SEB-DKL (S.D. Ind. Mar. 10, 2015)

Citing Cases

Young v. Colvin

In this type of situation, where the ALJ has clearly relied on agency medical experts to determine that…

Neldon v. Berryhill

The ALJ was thus not required to obtain additional medical expert testimony to support that conclusion beyond…