From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Susan Glaser v. County of

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 30, 2008
54 A.D.3d 997 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 2007-04516.

september 30, 2008.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for wrongful death, etc., the defendants Village of Warwick and Thomas M. Knapp appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Horowitz, J.), entered April 18, 2007, as, upon a jury verdict awarding the plaintiff damages in the principal sums of, inter alia, $1,000,000 for the decedent's conscious pain and suffering, $504,000 for past loss of earnings, and $800,000 for future loss of earnings, and upon the denial of their motion pursuant to CPLR 4404 to set aside the jury verdict, is in favor of the plaintiff and against them.

Rivkin Radler LLP, Uniondale, N.Y. (Evan H. Krinick, Cheryl F. Korman, and Melissa M. Murphy of counsel), for appellants.

Jacob Fuchsberg Law Firm LLP, (Sullivan Papain Block McGrath Cannavo P.C., New York, N.Y. [Brian J. Shoot and Leslie D. Kelmachter], of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Spolzino, J.P., Ritter, Santucci and Carni, JJ.


Ordered that the judgment is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law and the facts, with costs, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Orange County, for a new trial on the issue of damages for the decedent's conscious pain and suffering and past and future loss of earnings, unless within 30 days after service upon the plaintiff of a copy of this decision and order, the plaintiff shall serve and file in the office of the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Orange County, a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdict as to damages for the decedent's conscious pain and suffering from the principal sum of $1,000,000 to the principal sum of $350,000, to reduce the verdict as to damages for the decedent's past loss of earnings from the principal sum of $504,000 to the principal sum of $302,000, and to reduce the verdict as to damages for the decedent's future loss of earnings from the principal sum of $800,000 to the principal sum of $476,000 and to the entry of an appropriate amended judgment accordingly; in the event that the plaintiff so stipulates, then the judgment, as so reduced and amended, is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

On July 26, 2001, the plaintiffs decedent was fatally injured when the rear axle of a dump truck operated by the defendant Thomas M. Knapp and owned by the defendant Village of Warwick (hereinafter together the appellants) came loose and struck the decedent's windshield.

The plaintiffs medical expert testified that the decedent was conscious for approximately two to three minutes after the initial impact. The award of damages in the sum of $1,000,000 for the decedent's conscious pain and suffering deviates materially from what would be reasonable compensation, and was excessive to the extent indicated ( see CPLR 5501 [c]; Bennett v Henry, 39 AD3d 575; Rodd v Luxfer USA, 272 AD2d 535; cf. Twersky v Busche, 37 AD3d 704, 705).

In addition, the plaintiffs evidence did not establish some of the damages for past and future loss of earnings with the requisite certainty. Claims for lost earnings "'must be ascertainable with a reasonable degree of certainty and may not be based on conjecture'" ( Bailey v Jamaica Buses Co., 210 AD2d 192, quoting Long Is. Airports Limousine Serv. Corp. v Northwest Airlines, 124 AD2d 711, 713; see McKithen v City of New York, 292 AD2d 352). Accordingly, the awards for past and future loss of earnings are excessive to the extent indicated.

The appellants' remaining contentions are without merit.


Summaries of

Susan Glaser v. County of

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 30, 2008
54 A.D.3d 997 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

Susan Glaser v. County of

Case Details

Full title:SUSAN GLASER, Respondent, v. COUNTY OF ORANGE et al., Defendants, and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 30, 2008

Citations

54 A.D.3d 997 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 7212
864 N.Y.S.2d 557

Citing Cases

Kohl v. Young

See Keenan v. Molloy, 137 A.D.3d 868, 871 (2d Dep't 2016); see also Annexstein v. Inzerilli, No. 10-cv-3655,…

UGUR v. 140 BROADWAY PROP., LLC

Within Dr. Kaplan's records are several entries from November 2003-August 2005, which state that Plaintiff…