Opinion
2017-UP-234
05-31-2017
Mark Ostendorff, of Central, pro se. Brian Steed Tatum, of Tatum Law firm, PLLC, of Charlotte, North Carolina, for Respondent.
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
Submitted March 1, 2017
Appeal From York County S. Jackson Kimball, III, Master-in-Equity
Mark Ostendorff, of Central, pro se.
Brian Steed Tatum, of Tatum Law firm, PLLC, of Charlotte, North Carolina, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM
We dismiss this appeal pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and Shields v. Martin Marietta Corp., 303 S.C. 469, 470, 402 S.E.2d 482, 483 (1991) (holding an order restoring a case to the active docket is not directly appealable).
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
LOCKEMY, C.J., and HUFF and THOMAS, JJ., concur.