From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sung Kun Kim v. Panetta

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 1, 2013
516 F. App'x 268 (4th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 12-2311

04-01-2013

SUNG KUN KIM, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LEON E. PANETTA, Secretary, U.S. Dept. of Defense, Defendant - Appellee.

Sung Kun Kim, Appellant Pro Se. David Moskowitz, Assistant United States Attorney, Julie Ann Edelstein, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:11-cv-01370-LMB-TCB) Before NIEMEYER, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sung Kun Kim, Appellant Pro Se. David Moskowitz, Assistant United States Attorney, Julie Ann Edelstein, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Sung Kun Kim appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to his former employer in Kim's action alleging employment discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Kim v. Panetta, No. 1:11-cv-01370-LMB-TCB (E.D. Va. Aug. 21, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Sung Kun Kim v. Panetta

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 1, 2013
516 F. App'x 268 (4th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

Sung Kun Kim v. Panetta

Case Details

Full title:SUNG KUN KIM, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LEON E. PANETTA, Secretary, U.S…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 1, 2013

Citations

516 F. App'x 268 (4th Cir. 2013)

Citing Cases

Drake v. Sci. Applications Int'l Corp.

"Protected activity does not include generalized employment-related complaints unrelated to Title…