From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sun Lumber Company v. Bradfield

Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division Two
Apr 7, 1932
122 Cal.App. 783 (Cal. Ct. App. 1932)

Opinion

Docket No. 8242.

April 7, 1932.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Ruben S. Schmidt, Judge. Affirmed.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Glen Behymer for Appellant.

John F. Poole for Respondents.


In this action to quiet title the trial court entered its decree quieting the title of plaintiff and appellant against defendants with the exception of respondents herein and as to said respondents it decreed that they had a valid mechanic's lien upon the premises which was prior to the claim of said appellant. This appeal is taken on the judgment-roll.

[1] The property here involved is known as lots 16 and 17 in tract 3131 as per map thereof recorded in the records of Los Angeles County. The facts herein present precisely the same questions as those presented on the appeal in Sun Lumber Co. v. Bradfield et al., (No. 8241) ante, p. 391 [ 10 P.2d 183]. The opinion in said last-named appeal has been this day filed and for the reasons therein stated the decree herein is affirmed.

Nourse, P.J., and Sturtevant, J., concurred.


Summaries of

Sun Lumber Company v. Bradfield

Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division Two
Apr 7, 1932
122 Cal.App. 783 (Cal. Ct. App. 1932)
Case details for

Sun Lumber Company v. Bradfield

Case Details

Full title:SUN LUMBER COMPANY (a Corporation), Appellant, v. HERMAN C. BRADFIELD et…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division Two

Date published: Apr 7, 1932

Citations

122 Cal.App. 783 (Cal. Ct. App. 1932)
10 P.2d 185

Citing Cases

Greenblatt v. Utley

Sec. 1184.1 C.C.C.P. provides: "Improvement of lots or tracts of land — Any person who, at the instance or…