From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Summer H. v. N.Y.C. Dep't of Educ.

Court of Appeals of New York.
Oct 18, 2012
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 6994 (N.Y. 2012)

Opinion

2012-10-18

SUMMER H., etc., et al., Appellants, v. The NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, Respondent.

Apicella & Schlesinger, New York City (Alan C. Kestenbaum of counsel), for appellants. Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York City (Norman Corenthal of counsel), for respondent.


Apicella & Schlesinger, New York City (Alan C. Kestenbaum of counsel), for appellants. Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York City (Norman Corenthal of counsel), for respondent.
MEMORANDUM:

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to plaintiff ( see e.g. Branham v. Loews Orpheum Cinemas, Inc., 8 N.Y.3d 931, 931, 834 N.Y.S.2d 503, 866 N.E.2d 448 [2007] ), defendant demonstrated its entitlement to summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The infant-plaintiff's classmate's action in stepping backwards constituted a “thoughtless or careless act” not preventable by reasonable supervision ( Mirand v. City of New York, 84 N.Y.2d 44, 49, 614 N.Y.S.2d 372, 637 N.E.2d 263 [1994] ). Chief Judge LIPPMAN and Judges CIPARICK, GRAFFEO, READ, SMITH, PIGOTT and JONES concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.


Summaries of

Summer H. v. N.Y.C. Dep't of Educ.

Court of Appeals of New York.
Oct 18, 2012
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 6994 (N.Y. 2012)
Case details for

Summer H. v. N.Y.C. Dep't of Educ.

Case Details

Full title:SUMMER H., etc., et al., Appellants, v. The NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF…

Court:Court of Appeals of New York.

Date published: Oct 18, 2012

Citations

2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 6994 (N.Y. 2012)
19 N.Y.3d 1030
954 N.Y.S.2d 1
978 N.E.2d 593

Citing Cases

M.O. v. The City of New York

As to the inadequate supervision claim, plaintiffs failed to establish that it was unreasonable to allow a…

Genesis R. v. City of N.Y.

Moreover, as the motion court recognized, public policy favors resolution of disputes on the merits (see…