From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sullivan v. U.S.

U.S.
Oct 7, 2002
537 U.S. 935 (2002)

Summary

In Sullivan v. United States, 54 Fed. Cl. 214 (2002), the court, on a motion to dismiss, found that plaintiff, who was injured in an automobile accident by a government contractor who failed to obtain insurance as required by the contract, may be a third-party beneficiary of the contract because the purpose of any requirement to obtain insurance is the protection of the public.

Summary of this case from Agredano v. U.S.

Opinion

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT.

No. 02-5904.

October 7, 2002.


C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 40 Fed. Appx. 740.


Summaries of

Sullivan v. U.S.

U.S.
Oct 7, 2002
537 U.S. 935 (2002)

In Sullivan v. United States, 54 Fed. Cl. 214 (2002), the court, on a motion to dismiss, found that plaintiff, who was injured in an automobile accident by a government contractor who failed to obtain insurance as required by the contract, may be a third-party beneficiary of the contract because the purpose of any requirement to obtain insurance is the protection of the public.

Summary of this case from Agredano v. U.S.
Case details for

Sullivan v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:SULLIVAN v. UNITED STATES

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 7, 2002

Citations

537 U.S. 935 (2002)

Citing Cases

Agredano v. U.S.

In their response, plaintiffs assert a new theory that they "were [both] third party beneficiaries of the…

Sullivan v. U.S.

The trial court denied the motion, finding that the Sullivan had raised a triable issue regarding their…