From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sullivan v. Stephens

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Sep 17, 2014
No. 13-10870 (5th Cir. Sep. 17, 2014)

Opinion

No. 13-10870

09-17-2014

WILLIAM MARK SULLIVAN, Petitioner-Appellant v. WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, Respondent-Appellee


Summary Calendar Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:13-CV-135
Before BENAVIDES, SOUTHWICK, and COSTA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

William Mark Sullivan, formerly Texas prisoner # 1849693, appeals from the order dismissing his habeas corpus application under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Sullivan challenges one of his two 2000 convictions of aggravated sexual assault, state court case no. 10,805. He discharged that sentence in 2003. He was convicted in 2013 of failure to register as a sex offender. He discharged his sentence for failure to register on April 5, 2014, while this appeal was pending.

"This Court must examine the basis of its jurisdiction, on its own motion, if necessary." Mosley v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir. 1987). "Under Article III of the Constitution, federal courts may adjudicate only actual, ongoing cases or controversies." Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp., 494 U.S. 472, 477 (1990). Sullivan is no longer incarcerated on either the 2000 sentence or the 2013 sentence. His obligation to register as a sex offender does not render him "in custody" for purposes of a § 2254 challenge. See Calhoun v. Att'y Gen., 745 F.3d 1070, 1074 (10th Cir. 2014); Wilson v. Flaherty, 689 F.3d 332, 336-38 (4th Cir. 2012); Virsnieks v. Smith, 521 F.3d 707, 717-20 (7th Cir. 2008); Leslie v. Randle, 296 F.3d 518, 521-23 (6th Cir. 2002); Henry v. Lungren, 164 F.3d 1240, 1242 (9th Cir. 1999); Willliamson v. Gregoire, 151 F.3d 1180, 1183-84 (9th Cir. 1998). No case or controversy exists, and the appeal is moot. See Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 7 (1998).

APPEAL DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Sullivan v. Stephens

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Sep 17, 2014
No. 13-10870 (5th Cir. Sep. 17, 2014)
Case details for

Sullivan v. Stephens

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM MARK SULLIVAN, Petitioner-Appellant v. WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Sep 17, 2014

Citations

No. 13-10870 (5th Cir. Sep. 17, 2014)

Citing Cases

Young v. Butler Cnty. Court of Common Pleas

See Williamson v. Gregoire, 151 F.3d 1180, 1183-84 (9th Cir. 1998) (Washington); Henry v. Lungren, 164 F.3d…

Wilson v. Connecticut

Williamson, 151 F.3d at 1184. Five other circuits have followed suit, see Sullivan v. Stephens, 582 F. App'x…