From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sullivan, Long and Hagerty v. Robertson

Supreme Court of Florida
Jul 21, 1965
177 So. 2d 471 (Fla. 1965)

Opinion

No. 34284.

July 21, 1965.

Writ of Certiorari to Florida Industrial Commission.

Rodney Durrance and John McQuigg, of Shackleford, Farrior, Stallings, Glos Evans, Tampa, for petitioners.

Calvin J. Faucett, Tampa, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.


By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date March 1, 1965.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied.

THORNAL, C.J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, O'CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Sullivan, Long and Hagerty v. Robertson

Supreme Court of Florida
Jul 21, 1965
177 So. 2d 471 (Fla. 1965)
Case details for

Sullivan, Long and Hagerty v. Robertson

Case Details

Full title:SULLIVAN, LONG AND HAGERTY ET AL., PETITIONERS, v. CHARLES B. ROBERTSON ET…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Jul 21, 1965

Citations

177 So. 2d 471 (Fla. 1965)

Citing Cases

Fraser v. Kichline

Whelchel, Dunlap Gignilliat, Wm. R. Gignilliat, contra. 1. The case of Long v. Robertson, 41 Ga. App. 712 (…

Dally v. Arnold

We have also considered the question, not made by the motion for new trial or raised in the briefs filed by…