From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Suleiman v. Speedling

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 7, 1999
262 A.D.2d 397 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

Submitted April 28, 1999

June 7, 1999

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant John Speedling appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Bernhard, J.), dated May 29, 1998, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against him.

Gerald G. Cowen, Elmsford, N.Y. (Stephen J. Hubel of counsel), for appellant.

Finkelstein, Levine, Gittelsohn Partners, Newburgh, N Y (Steven A. Kimmel of counsel), for plaintiff-respondent.

SONDRA MILLER, J.P., THOMAS R. SULLIVAN, WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court correctly denied the appellant's motion for summary judgment in this case involving a multiple-vehicle automobile accident. The plaintiff alleged that the vehicle operated by the defendant Jeffrey Betts came into contact with the rear of the appellant's vehicle, and that the appellant's vehicle came into contact with the rear of the plaintiffs vehicle. Since the plaintiff testified that her vehicle was impacted twice from the rear, there is a question of fact as to how the accident occurred, and whether the appellant was negligent ( see, e.g., Sanford v. Stillitano, 241 A.D.2d 489).


Summaries of

Suleiman v. Speedling

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 7, 1999
262 A.D.2d 397 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Suleiman v. Speedling

Case Details

Full title:JULIANA SULEIMAN, plaintiff-respondent, v. JOHN SPEEDLING, appellant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 7, 1999

Citations

262 A.D.2d 397 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
689 N.Y.S.2d 668

Citing Cases

Poll v. Mallah

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs. Contrary to the appellant's contentions, the Supreme Court…

DeFalco v. Parker

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as reviewed, with costs. Contrary to the contention of the…