From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Suggs v. Maxymillian

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Sep 30, 2015
9:13-CV-359 (NAM/TWD) (N.D.N.Y. Sep. 30, 2015)

Opinion

9:13-CV-359 (NAM/TWD)

09-30-2015

JOHN SUGGS, ANDRE LANE, RICHARD ROSADO, and RYAN PRZESIEK, Plaintiffs, v. DR. TERRI MAXYMILLIAN, JEFF NOWICKI, PETER RUSSELL, and ANN SULLIVAN, Defendants.

APPEARANCES: Bond, Schoeneck & King, PLLC George H. Lowe, Esq., of counsel One Lincoln Center Syracuse, New York 13202 Attorney for Plaintiffs Hon. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General of the State of New York Christopher W. Hall, Esq., Assistant New York State Attorney The Capitol Albany, New York 12224 Attorney for Defendants


APPEARANCES: Bond, Schoeneck & King, PLLC
George H. Lowe, Esq., of counsel
One Lincoln Center
Syracuse, New York 13202
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Hon. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General of the State of New York
Christopher W. Hall, Esq., Assistant New York State Attorney
The Capitol
Albany, New York 12224
Attorney for Defendants
Hon. Norman A. Mordue, Senior U.S. District Judge :

MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER

Plaintiffs filed a pro se complaint on April 1, 2013. On March 28, 2014, United States Magistrate Judge Thérèse Wiley Dancks granted plaintiffs' request for appointment of counsel and stayed the remaining pretrial deadlines pending further order. On September 2, 2014, Magistrate Judge Dancks appointed Bond, Schoeneck & King, PLLC, as pro bono counsel for plaintiffs. On December 5, 2014, defendants made the instant motion (Dkt. No. 37) for summary judgment. On July 24, 2015, plaintiffs moved (Dkt. No. 51) for leave to file a first amended complaint.

Upon referral pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72.3(c), United States Magistrate Judge Thérèse Wiley Dancks issued a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 58) recommending that plaintiffs' motion for leave to file a first amended complaint be granted; that a new discovery scheduling order be issued; that defendants' motion for summary judgment be denied without prejudice to refiling after the conclusion of discovery; and that Clerk be directed to correct the docket to reflect changes in the parties.

The changes in the parties are reflected in the caption of the proposed first amended complaint (Dkt. No. 51) and in this Memorandum-Decision and Order. --------

Objections to the Report and Recommendation were due on or before October 1, 2015. Defendants filed their objection on September 28, 2015. Plaintiffs' counsel has informed the Court that he does not intend to submit anything further. Therefore, the Court proceeds to address the Report and Recommendation and defendants' objections thereto. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court conducts de novo review.

Defendants oppose amendment of the complaint primarily on the ground of futility. The Court finds, however, as does Magistrate Judge Dancks, that plaintiffs have adequately shown that there are triable issues of fact regarding the claims in the proposed first amended complaint, and that plaintiffs are entitled to counseled discovery. On de novo review of Magistrate Judge Dancks' thorough Report and Recommendation, defendants' objection thereto, and the papers underlying both pending motions, the Court accepts the Report and Recommendation.

It is therefore

ORDERED that the United States Magistrate Judge Thérèse Wiley Dancks' Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 58) is accepted in its entirety; and it is further

ORDERED that plaintiffs' motion for leave to file a first amended complaint (Dkt. No. 51) is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk's Office is directed to file plaintiffs' proposed first amended complaint (Dkt. No. 51-2, pp. 4-13) as the first amended complaint herein, and that it become the operative pleading in the case; and it is further

ORDERED that a new discovery schedule be agreed upon with Magistrate Judge Dancks; and it is further

ORDERED that defendants' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 37) is denied; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk's Office is directed to correct the docket to show the substitution of Peter Russell, currently the Acting Executive Director of CNYPC, for former Executive Director Maureen Bosco, as a defendant in the case; the substitution of Ann Sullivan, currently the Commissioner of the New York Office of Mental Health, for former Acting Commissioner of the New York Office of Mental Health Kristin Woodlock, as a defendant in the case; and the termination of Raymond Lagree as a plaintiff in the case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: September 30, 2015

Syracuse, New York

/s/ _________

Norman A. Mordue

Senior U.S. District Judge


Summaries of

Suggs v. Maxymillian

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Sep 30, 2015
9:13-CV-359 (NAM/TWD) (N.D.N.Y. Sep. 30, 2015)
Case details for

Suggs v. Maxymillian

Case Details

Full title:JOHN SUGGS, ANDRE LANE, RICHARD ROSADO, and RYAN PRZESIEK, Plaintiffs, v…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Sep 30, 2015

Citations

9:13-CV-359 (NAM/TWD) (N.D.N.Y. Sep. 30, 2015)