From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sugar Hill Prop. Vehicle I, LLC v. Ashley

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York, First Department.
May 14, 2013
39 Misc. 3d 143 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

No. 12–169.

2013-05-14

SUGAR HILL PROPERTY VEHICLE I, LLC, Petitioner–Respondent, v. Colin ASHLEY, Respondent–Appellant.


Respondent Colin Ashley appeals from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Cheryl J. Gonzales, J.), dated September 30, 2011, which granted petitioner's motion for summary judgment of possession in a holdover summary proceeding and denied respondent's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the petition.
PRESENT: LOWE, III, P.J., SHULMAN, HUNTER, JR., JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Order (Cheryl J. Gonzales, J.), dated September 30, 2011, affirmed, with $10 costs.

In opposition to petitioner's prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on the holdover petition, appellant failed to establish any basis for his continued occupancy of the subject stabilized apartment. Notably, the leasehold of the record tenant (Saleh) was properly terminated pursuant to a(n) (unappealed) final judgment issued in favor of petitioner in a prior summary eviction proceeding, and Saleh's tenancy is no longer in issue. With respect to appellant, neither the prior building owner's apparent knowledge of appellant's occupancy in the apartment—as Saleh's roommate—nor the acceptance by petitioner or its predecessor of appellant's rent payments was sufficient, on this record and without more, to confer full stabilization protection upon appellant, or to require a trial on the issue. Any month-to-month tenancy created by appellant's tenders of rent ( seeReal Property Law § 232–c) was properly terminated by way of the 30–day notice served herein by petitioner ( seeReal Property Law § 232–a; Weiden v. 926 Park Ave. Corp., 154 A.D.2d 308, 308–309 [1989] ).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.


Summaries of

Sugar Hill Prop. Vehicle I, LLC v. Ashley

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York, First Department.
May 14, 2013
39 Misc. 3d 143 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

Sugar Hill Prop. Vehicle I, LLC v. Ashley

Case Details

Full title:SUGAR HILL PROPERTY VEHICLE I, LLC, Petitioner–Respondent, v. Colin…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York, First Department.

Date published: May 14, 2013

Citations

39 Misc. 3d 143 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 50773
971 N.Y.S.2d 75