Opinion
2013-08606
07-29-2015
In the Matter of MERCEDES R.B. (Anonymous). Suffolk County Department of Social Services, petitioner-respondent; Heather C. (Anonymous), appellant, et al., respondent.
Arza R. Feldman, Uniondale, N.Y., for appellant. Dennis M. Brown, County Attorney, Central Islip, N.Y. (Randall J. Ratje of counsel), for petitioner-respondent. Heather A. Fig, Bayport, N.Y., attorney for the child.
Arza R. Feldman, Uniondale, N.Y., for appellant.Dennis M. Brown, County Attorney, Central Islip, N.Y. (Randall J. Ratje of counsel), for petitioner-respondent.
Heather A. Fig, Bayport, N.Y., attorney for the child.
Opinion Appeal from an order of fact-finding and disposition of the Family Court, Suffolk County (David Freundlich, J.), entered August 15, 2013. The order, insofar as appealed from, after fact-finding and dispositional hearings, found that the mother permanently neglected the subject child, terminated her parental rights, and committed the child to the custody and guardianship of the Suffolk County Department of Social Services for the purpose of adoption.
ORDERED that the order of fact-finding and disposition is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
The petitioner established, by clear and convincing evidence, that it exercised diligent efforts to strengthen the parent-child relationship by, inter alia, scheduling visits between the mother and the child, providing referrals for court-ordered programs, and advising the mother of the importance of complying with the court's directives (see Matter of Tamara F.J. [Jaineen J.], 108 A.D.3d 543, 543–544, 969 N.Y.S.2d 119 ; Matter of John M. [Raymond K.], 82 A.D.3d 1100, 919 N.Y.S.2d 346 ; Matter of Danielle Joy K., 60 A.D.3d 948, 875 N.Y.S.2d 257 ). Despite these efforts, the mother failed to plan for the return of the child by, among other things, failing to attend a substance abuse treatment program and to participate in psychotherapy. Although the mother completed a parenting course, she did not address her substance abuse and mental health issues (see Matter of Travis G. [Carmen M.], 117 A.D.3d 1049, 986 N.Y.S.2d 569 ). Accordingly, the Family Court properly determined that the mother had permanently neglected the child and that it was in the child's best interests to terminate the mother's parental rights (see Matter of Tamara F.J. [Jaineen J.], 108 A.D.3d at 544, 969 N.Y.S.2d 119 ).
SKELOS, J.P., LEVENTHAL, HINDS–RADIX and MALTESE, JJ., concur.