From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sturkey v. Ozmint

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Mar 1, 2010
368 F. App'x 337 (4th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 09-6535.

Submitted: February 9, 2010.

Decided: March 1, 2010.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (8:07-cv-01502-MBS).

Willie Joe Sturkey, Appellant Pro Se. Nathaniel Heyward Clarkson, III, Amy Miller Snyder, Clarkson Walsh Terrell Coulter, PA, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.


Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Willie Joe Sturkey appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sturkey v. Ozmint, No. 8:07-cv-01502-MBS, 2009 WL 649569 (D.S.C. Mar. 11, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Sturkey v. Ozmint

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Mar 1, 2010
368 F. App'x 337 (4th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

Sturkey v. Ozmint

Case Details

Full title:Willie Joe STURKEY, a/k/a Willie Sturkey, a/k/a Willie J. Sturkey…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Mar 1, 2010

Citations

368 F. App'x 337 (4th Cir. 2010)

Citing Cases

Lalone v. Thompson

"Courts have recognized that inmates possess a protected property interest in their funds." Sturkey v.…