From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stull v. Russo

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit
Dec 30, 1955
85 So. 2d 116 (La. Ct. App. 1955)

Opinion

No. 4083.

December 30, 1955.

Appeal from Eighteenth Judicial District Court, Parish of Pointe Coupee; C. Iris Dupont, Judge.

De Blieux Hinton, Baton Rouge, for appellant.

Cashio, Cashio Molloy, Maringouin, for appellee.


This is a companion suit to Stull v. V.J. Russo, La.App., 85 So.2d 112.

The only evidence in the record to indicate any relationship between L.J. Russo, father, and the injured employee, is that L.J. Russo owned the land upon which V.J. Russo son operated the business in which plaintiff was injured. Since defendant herein was not plaintiff's employer, the judgment of District Court dismissing plaintiff's suit as against L.J. Russo is affirmed. This suit is in forma pauperis, and therefore plaintiff will not be assessed with costs.


Summaries of

Stull v. Russo

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit
Dec 30, 1955
85 So. 2d 116 (La. Ct. App. 1955)
Case details for

Stull v. Russo

Case Details

Full title:TOM STULL v. L.J. RUSSO

Court:Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit

Date published: Dec 30, 1955

Citations

85 So. 2d 116 (La. Ct. App. 1955)