From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Student Public v. Monsanto Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nov 24, 1989
891 F.2d 283 (3d Cir. 1989)

Summary

stating that a motion for reconsideration "may address only those matters of fact or issues of law which were presented to, but not considered by, the court in the course of making the decision at issue."

Summary of this case from Amersham Biosciences Corp. v. Perkinelmer, Inc.

Opinion

No. 89-5520.

November 24, 1989.

D.N.J., VanArtsdalen, J., 727.


DECISIONS WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINIONS

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Student Public v. Monsanto Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nov 24, 1989
891 F.2d 283 (3d Cir. 1989)

stating that a motion for reconsideration "may address only those matters of fact or issues of law which were presented to, but not considered by, the court in the course of making the decision at issue."

Summary of this case from Amersham Biosciences Corp. v. Perkinelmer, Inc.
Case details for

Student Public v. Monsanto Co.

Case Details

Full title:Student Public Interest Re search Group of New Jersey, Inc., v. Monsanto Co

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: Nov 24, 1989

Citations

891 F.2d 283 (3d Cir. 1989)

Citing Cases

Apple Corps Ltd. v. International Collectors Society

Many courts have held that there is no need for even two attorneys to attend court proceedings such as a…

Amersham Biosciences Corp. v. Perkinelmer, Inc.

"The motion may address only those matters of fact or issues of law which were presented to, but not…