From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stuckey v. Stuckey

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Jul 24, 2014
NO. 03-14-00219-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 24, 2014)

Opinion

NO. 03-14-00219-CV

07-24-2014

Janet Denise Stuckey, Appellant v. John Stuckey, Appellee


FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 126TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-FM-13-002351, HONORABLE JOHN K. DIETZ, JUDGE PRESIDING


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant's brief was due on June 4, 2014. On June 13, 2014, this Court notified appellant that her brief was overdue and that a failure to respond by June 23, 2014, could result in the dismissal of this appeal for want of prosecution. To date, appellant has not filed a brief or a motion for extension of time. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a); 42.3(b).

__________

Scott K. Field, Justice
Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton, and Field Dismissed for Want of Prosecution


Summaries of

Stuckey v. Stuckey

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Jul 24, 2014
NO. 03-14-00219-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 24, 2014)
Case details for

Stuckey v. Stuckey

Case Details

Full title:Janet Denise Stuckey, Appellant v. John Stuckey, Appellee

Court:TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

Date published: Jul 24, 2014

Citations

NO. 03-14-00219-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 24, 2014)