From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Strykul v. PRG Parking Orlando, L.L.C.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION
Feb 24, 2015
Case No: 6:14-cv-211-Orl-31GJK (M.D. Fla. Feb. 24, 2015)

Opinion

Case No: 6:14-cv-211-Orl-31GJK

02-24-2015

JOHANNA STRYKUL, Plaintiff, v. PRG PARKING ORLANDO, L.L.C., Defendant.


ORDER

This cause comes before the Court on Defendant's Motion to Quantify Attorney's Fees Regarding Motion to Compel Plaintiff's Responses to Defendant's Initial Discovery (Doc. No. 53), filed January 13, 2015.

On February 3, 2015, the United States Magistrate Judge issued a report (Doc. No. 58) recommending that the motion be granted. No objections have been filed. Therefore, it is

ORDERED as follows:

1. The Report and Recommendation is CONFIRMED and ADOPTED as part of this Order.

2. The Motion to Quantify Attorney's Fees Regarding Motion to Compel is GRANTED. Defendant is awarded $619.00 in attorneys' fees against Plaintiff.

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, Orlando, Florida on February 24, 2015.

/s/ _________

GREGORY A. PRESNELL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record
Unrepresented Party


Summaries of

Strykul v. PRG Parking Orlando, L.L.C.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION
Feb 24, 2015
Case No: 6:14-cv-211-Orl-31GJK (M.D. Fla. Feb. 24, 2015)
Case details for

Strykul v. PRG Parking Orlando, L.L.C.

Case Details

Full title:JOHANNA STRYKUL, Plaintiff, v. PRG PARKING ORLANDO, L.L.C., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

Date published: Feb 24, 2015

Citations

Case No: 6:14-cv-211-Orl-31GJK (M.D. Fla. Feb. 24, 2015)

Citing Cases

Poleon v. Estes Express Lines

When a party fails to respond, that is an indication that the motion is unopposed. Foster v. Coca-Cola Co.,…

Parekh v. CBS Corp.

Plaintiff has not filed a response in opposition and the time to do so has passed; therefore, the Court…