From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Strouse v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Jun 18, 2013
CASE NO. 8:12-CIV-1698-T-17-EAJ (M.D. Fla. Jun. 18, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. 8:12-CIV-1698-T-17-EAJ

06-18-2013

BRIAN STROUSE, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This cause is before the Court on the report and recommendation (R&R) issued by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Jenkins on May 30, 2013 (Doc. 14). The magistrate judge recommended that the Court affirm the decision of the Commissioner denying the plaintiff's claims for a period of disability.

Pursuant to Rule 6.02, Rules of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, the parties had fourteen (14) days after service to file written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations, or be barred from attacking the factual findings on appeal. No timely objections to the report and recommendation were filed.

STANDARD OF REVIEW

When a party makes a timely and specific objection to a finding of fact in the report and recommendation, the district court should make a de novo review of the record with respect to that factual issue. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); U.S. v. Raddatz, 447 U.S. 667 (1980); Jeffrey S. v. State Board of Education of State of Georgia, 896 f.2d 507 (11th Cir. 1990). However, when no timely and specific objections are filed, case law indicates that the court should review the findings using a clearly erroneous standard. Gropp v. United Airlines, Inc., 817 F.Supp. 1558, 1562 (M.D. Fla. 1993).

The Court has reviewed the report and recommendation and made an independent review of the record. Upon due consideration, the Court concurs with the report and recommendation. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the report and recommendation, May 30, 2013 (Doc. 14) be adopted and incorporated by reference; the Court affirms the decision of the Commissioner denying the plaintiff's claims for a period of disability. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment for the defendant and against the plaintiff, to close the case and terminate any pending motions.

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, in Tampa, Florida, this 18th day of June, 2013.

______________________________

ELIZABETH A. KOVACHEVICH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies to:
All parties and counsel of record
Assigned Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Strouse v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Jun 18, 2013
CASE NO. 8:12-CIV-1698-T-17-EAJ (M.D. Fla. Jun. 18, 2013)
Case details for

Strouse v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN STROUSE, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Date published: Jun 18, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 8:12-CIV-1698-T-17-EAJ (M.D. Fla. Jun. 18, 2013)

Citing Cases

Dumas v. Colvin

See Macia v. Bowen, 829 F.2d 1009, 1012 (11th Cir. 1987)("The regulations do not, however, prevent the ALJ…