Summary
ruling that, after Sprint, Younger does not apply when the pending state action is a divorce proceeding
Summary of this case from Argen v. KesslerOpinion
2:14cv1518
07-23-2015
Electronic Filing MEMORANDUM ORDER
AND NOW, this 23rd day of July, 2015, after the plaintiff, Colleen Strom, filed an Amended Complaint in the above-captioned case, and after a motion to dismiss was submitted by Defendants Thomas W. Corbett and Kathleen Kane, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge granting the parties a period of time after being served with a copy to file written objections thereto, and no objections having been filed, and upon independent review of the motion and the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 38), which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,
IT IS ORDERED that the motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint filed by Defendants Thomas W. Corbett and Kathleen Kane (ECF No. 27) is GRANTED.
/s/_________
David Stewart Cercone
United States District Judge
cc: Colleen M. Strom
2361 Tilbury Avenue
Pittsburgh, PA 15217
(Via First Class Mail)
Mary Lynch Friedline, Esquire
Scott A. Bradley, Esquire
Michael P. Daley, Esquire
(Via CM/ECF Electronic Mail)