From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Strojnik v. Orangewood LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 22, 2020
CV 19-00946 DSF (JCx) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 22, 2020)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

finding that plaintiff did not sufficiently allege an intent to return to the hotel in question because there were "no allegations as to why Plaintiff prefers this particular Hilton property, as opposed to others in the 'Disneyland area'"

Summary of this case from Strojnik v. Portola Hotel, LLC
See 6 Summaries

Opinion

CV 19-00946 DSF (JCx)

01-22-2020

PETER STROJNIK, SR., Plaintiff, v. ORANGEWOOD LLC d/b/a DOUBLETREE SUITES BY HILTON ANAHEIM RESORT CONVENTION CENTER, Defendant.

Dale S. Fischer United States District Judge

JUDGMENT

The Court having granted a motion to dismiss,

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff take nothing, that the federal law claim be dismissed with prejudice, that the state law claims be dismissed without prejudice to bringing those claims in state court, and that Defendant recover just costs pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1919. Date: January 22, 2020

/s/_________

Dale S. Fischer

United States District Judge

Summaries of

Strojnik v. Orangewood LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 22, 2020
CV 19-00946 DSF (JCx) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 22, 2020)

finding that plaintiff did not sufficiently allege an intent to return to the hotel in question because there were "no allegations as to why Plaintiff prefers this particular Hilton property, as opposed to others in the 'Disneyland area'"

Summary of this case from Strojnik v. Portola Hotel, LLC

finding that plaintiff did not sufficiently allege an intent to return to the hotel in question because there were "no allegations as to why Plaintiff prefers this particular Hilton property, as opposed to others in the 'Disneyland area.'"

Summary of this case from Strojnik v. R.F. Weichert V, Inc.

dismissing without leave to amend because "Plaintiff has had ample opportunity to plead facts sufficient to support standing and has failed to do so"

Summary of this case from Strojnik v. Capitol Regency, LLC

In Strojnik v. Kapalua Land Company, the court rejected the plaintiff's contention that insufficient information on a website constituted an actionable ADA violation that actually denied him equal access to the hotel property.

Summary of this case from Love v. Marriott Hotel Servs.

In Strojnik v. Orangewood, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11743 (C.D. Cal. January 22, 2020), aff'd Strojnik v. Orangewood LLC, 829 F. App'x 783 (9th Cir. 2020), the court rejected another ADA litigant's claim that the website contained insufficient information.

Summary of this case from Love v. Marriott Hotel Servs.

In Orangewood, Strojnik alleged that he "requires a 'marked drop off zone so he can get in and out of the vehicle in a properly marked location in front of the Hotel' and... 'requires the closest accessible route' from the drop off point to the hotel entrance."

Summary of this case from Strojnik v. Bakersfield Convention Hotel I, LLC.
Case details for

Strojnik v. Orangewood LLC

Case Details

Full title:PETER STROJNIK, SR., Plaintiff, v. ORANGEWOOD LLC d/b/a DOUBLETREE SUITES…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 22, 2020

Citations

CV 19-00946 DSF (JCx) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 22, 2020)

Citing Cases

Strojnik v. Capitol Regency, LLC

(ECF No. 27 at 3-4.) See, e.g., Strojnik v. R.F. Weichert V, Inc., 2021 WL 242912, at *4 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 25,…

Whitaker v. Infinite Loop Cupertino Hotel, LLC

Additional cases from across the Ninth Circuit have also concluded that similar disclosures from other hotel…

21 Citing Cases