From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Strojnik v. Driftwood Hosp. Mgmt.

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Nov 19, 2021
No. CV-20-01532-PHX-DJH (D. Ariz. Nov. 19, 2021)

Opinion

CV-20-01532-PHX-DJH

11-19-2021

Peter Strojnik, Plaintiff, v. Driftwood Hospitality Management LLC, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Honorable Diane J. Humetewa United States District Judge

Pending before the Court in this consolidated action is Defendants Xenia Hotels and Resorts, Inc.; XHR Phoenix Palms, LLC; and XHR Scottsdale Ranch, LLC's (collectively “Xenia”) Motion to File Fee Agreements Under Seal (Doc. 85). Plaintiff has not filed a response, but one is not necessary. The Motion is denied.

The public has a general right to court documents, but this right is not absolute. Kamakana v. City & County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006). A party seeking to seal a document must give compelling reasons supported by specific factual findings. Id. Generally, compelling reasons exist when documents might become “a vehicle for improper purposes . . . .” Id. at 1179 (quoting Nixon v. Warner Commc'ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 598 (1978)).

Xenia seeks to seal its fee agreement with counsel because it “contains confidential information relating to the nature of the case, the nature of the representation and the scope and terms of counsel's engagement.” (Doc. 85 at 3). Xenia argues that this information is meant to be communicated between an attorney and client and that there “is little if any benefit that the public would glean” from seeing the agreement. (Id.)

The Court finds, Xenia has not demonstrated how the fee agreements could be used for an improper purpose. Furthermore, the public's right to court documents is not overcome just because a party thinks the public would have little to glean from the documents in question. Therefore, Xenia has not provided compelling reasons or specific facts warranting a seal of its fee agreements.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Xenia's Motion to File Fee Agreements Under Seal (Doc. 85) is denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Xenia shall file its fee agreements, as directed by the Court's prior Order (Doc. 83) on the public record within three (3) days of this Order's entry.


Summaries of

Strojnik v. Driftwood Hosp. Mgmt.

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Nov 19, 2021
No. CV-20-01532-PHX-DJH (D. Ariz. Nov. 19, 2021)
Case details for

Strojnik v. Driftwood Hosp. Mgmt.

Case Details

Full title:Peter Strojnik, Plaintiff, v. Driftwood Hospitality Management LLC, et…

Court:United States District Court, District of Arizona

Date published: Nov 19, 2021

Citations

No. CV-20-01532-PHX-DJH (D. Ariz. Nov. 19, 2021)

Citing Cases

Wells Fargo Bank NA v. Worldwide Auto Car Co.

Regardless, courts in this district have found the argument to seal an entire fee agreement due to…